<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<journal>
  <titleid>69439</titleid>
  <issn>2658-5553</issn>
  <journalInfo lang="ENG">
    <title>AlfaBuild</title>
  </journalInfo>
  <issue>
    <volume>12</volume>
    <number>5</number>
    <altNumber>12</altNumber>
    <dateUni>2019</dateUni>
    <pages>1-111</pages>
    <articles>
      <article>
        <artType>RAR</artType>
        <langPubl>RUS</langPubl>
        <pages>7-14</pages>
        <authors>
          <author num="001">
            <individInfo lang="ENG">
              <orgName>Peter the Great Saint Petersburg Polytechnic University</orgName>
              <surname>Galikhanova</surname>
              <initials>Elina</initials>
              <email>linlvs.g@gmail.com</email>
              <address>St. Petersburg, Russia</address>
            </individInfo>
          </author>
          <author num="002">
            <individInfo lang="ENG">
              <orgName>Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University</orgName>
              <surname>Bakaeva</surname>
              <initials>Liubov</initials>
              <email>lubashka150994@mail.ru</email>
              <address>St. Petersburg, Russia</address>
            </individInfo>
          </author>
          <author num="003">
            <individInfo lang="ENG">
              <orgName>Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University</orgName>
              <surname>Dernakova</surname>
              <initials>Aleksandra</initials>
              <email>sasha231296@mail.ru</email>
              <address>St. Petersburg, Russia</address>
            </individInfo>
          </author>
          <author num="004">
            <individInfo lang="ENG">
              <orgName>Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University</orgName>
              <surname>Yarunicheva</surname>
              <initials>Yuliya</initials>
              <email>julija.jarunicheva@gmail.com</email>
              <address>St. Petersburg, Russia</address>
            </individInfo>
          </author>
        </authors>
        <artTitles>
          <artTitle lang="ENG">Polyurethane elastomer as an elastic material in seismic protection of buildings and structures</artTitle>
        </artTitles>
        <abstracts>
          <abstract lang="ENG">The article is devoted to the issue of reliable and economical seismic protection of buildings and structures. Of all the existing options, one most common type of point supports is chosen, which is a layered structure of alternately laid sheets of the elastic element and the metal. For elastic material, as having the best mechanical characteristics, a polyurethane elastomer is chosen. With the help of the servo-hydraulic system for static and dynamic tests Instron 8801, experiments were performed on axial compression to compare the mechanical characteristics of five different grades of polyurethanes: L167, V8000 + 7561 + BDO, 15s27, LF751D + L167 + Mokko, LF751 + L167 + Mokko at different temperature conditions. A comparative table is made of the modulus of elasticity change at a temperature close to room temperature and elevated temperature. The graphs of the hysteresis loop for each brand of polyurethanes are constructed.</abstract>
        </abstracts>
        <codes>
          <doi>10.34910/ALF.12.1</doi>
        </codes>
        <keywords>
          <kwdGroup lang="ENG">
            <keyword>construction</keyword>
            <keyword>seismic protection</keyword>
            <keyword>elastomers</keyword>
            <keyword>elastomeric bearings</keyword>
            <keyword>energy intensity</keyword>
            <keyword>shock absorbers</keyword>
            <keyword>anti-seismic device</keyword>
            <keyword>polyurethanes</keyword>
          </kwdGroup>
        </keywords>
        <files>
          <furl>https://alfabuild.spbstu.ru/article/2019.12.1/</furl>
          <file>12_1.pdf</file>
        </files>
      </article>
      <article>
        <artType>REV</artType>
        <langPubl>RUS</langPubl>
        <pages>15-26</pages>
        <authors>
          <author num="001">
            <individInfo lang="ENG">
              <orgName>Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University</orgName>
              <surname>Bakaeva</surname>
              <initials>Liubov</initials>
              <email>lubashka150994@mail.ru</email>
              <address>St. Petersburg, Russia</address>
            </individInfo>
          </author>
          <author num="002">
            <individInfo lang="ENG">
              <orgName>Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University</orgName>
              <surname>Egarmin</surname>
              <initials>Konstantin</initials>
              <email>kon.egarmin@mail.ru</email>
              <address>St. Petersburg, Russia</address>
            </individInfo>
          </author>
          <author num="003">
            <individInfo lang="ENG">
              <orgName>Peter the Great Saint Petersburg Polytechnic University</orgName>
              <surname>Galikhanova</surname>
              <initials>Elina</initials>
              <email>linlvs.g@gmail.com</email>
              <address>St. Petersburg, Russia</address>
            </individInfo>
          </author>
        </authors>
        <artTitles>
          <artTitle lang="ENG">Effect of using rubber-metal seismic bearings on the dynamic and static characteristics of a multi-storey building.</artTitle>
        </artTitles>
        <abstracts>
          <abstract lang="ENG">Seismic danger is a significant factor in the choice of residence and has a great impact on the economic side of construction. The task of modern engineers is to search for optimal safe seismic construction decisions, even for seismically dangerous regions of the country. Dynamic characteristics obtained from 2 calculation models are investigated in the article: with seismic isolation and without seismic isolation. As an active seismic isolation rubber-metal supports are chosen as one of the most promising and modern methods. In the calculations, a seismic load is assigned for the area with seismicity of 9 points and for category II of soils. Calculations are made on a finite-element scheme, modeled in SCAD Office programs. The model is a section of a residential building located in Sochi. The characteristics of both computational models are compared: acceleration, displacement of the CE, torque, longitudinal forces. A comparative analysis is given and a conclusion is drawn about the effectiveness of using seismic insulating rubber mounts.</abstract>
        </abstracts>
        <codes>
          <doi>10.34910/ALF.12.2</doi>
        </codes>
        <keywords>
          <kwdGroup lang="ENG">
            <keyword>construction</keyword>
            <keyword>seismic protection</keyword>
            <keyword>rubber-metal supports</keyword>
            <keyword>energy intensity</keyword>
            <keyword>shock absorbers</keyword>
            <keyword>anti-seismic device</keyword>
            <keyword>polyurethanes</keyword>
          </kwdGroup>
        </keywords>
        <files>
          <furl>https://alfabuild.spbstu.ru/article/2019.12.2/</furl>
          <file>12_2.pdf</file>
        </files>
      </article>
      <article>
        <artType>RAR</artType>
        <langPubl>RUS</langPubl>
        <pages>27-33</pages>
        <authors>
          <author num="001">
            <individInfo lang="ENG">
              <orgName>Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University</orgName>
              <surname>Gholami Fard</surname>
              <initials>Rezvan</initials>
              <email>gholamifard.rezvan@gmail.com</email>
              <address>St. Petersburg, Russia</address>
            </individInfo>
          </author>
          <author num="002">
            <individInfo lang="ENG">
              <orgName>Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University</orgName>
              <surname>Badenko</surname>
              <initials>Vladimir</initials>
              <email>badenko@cef.spbstu.ru</email>
              <address>St. Petersburg, Russia</address>
            </individInfo>
          </author>
        </authors>
        <artTitles>
          <artTitle lang="ENG">Evaluation of aspect ratio (B/Y) in design of least-cost trapezoidal channel section</artTitle>
        </artTitles>
        <abstracts>
          <abstract lang="ENG">From a long time ago, there is a question to decide if a channel should be designed to have the highest hydraulic efficiency or the least cost.Channel cross-section design with an optimal cost under uniform-flow conditions includes minimizing the total cost per unit length of the channel. In this study, a large amount of construction cost of the channel was investigated and analyzed to calculate the cost function of the channel as a total cost associated with the land acquisition, channel material coverage and ground drilling depth for the channel. Case studies carried out in this technical note show that the difference between low-cost and efficient sections is closely related to the cost of the channel lining relative to the cost of land. When the base cover disappears to the unit cost of the land, the difference between the two parts is almost decreasing. This transaction was performed in the normal equation to provide a straightforward solution to the low-cost channel.</abstract>
        </abstracts>
        <codes>
          <doi>10.34910/ALF.12.3</doi>
        </codes>
        <keywords>
          <kwdGroup lang="ENG">
            <keyword>open-channel flow</keyword>
            <keyword>least-Cost</keyword>
            <keyword>cross-section</keyword>
            <keyword>aspect ratio</keyword>
            <keyword>hydraulic design</keyword>
          </kwdGroup>
        </keywords>
        <files>
          <furl>https://alfabuild.spbstu.ru/article/2019.12.3/</furl>
          <file>12_3.pdf</file>
        </files>
      </article>
      <article>
        <artType>RAR</artType>
        <langPubl>RUS</langPubl>
        <pages>34-43</pages>
        <authors>
          <author num="001">
            <individInfo lang="ENG">
              <orgName>Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University</orgName>
              <surname>Volkov</surname>
              <initials>Timofey</initials>
              <email>timonvolk@mail.ru</email>
              <address>St. Petersburg, Russia</address>
            </individInfo>
          </author>
          <author num="002">
            <individInfo lang="ENG">
              <orgName>Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University</orgName>
              <surname>Pozdnyshev</surname>
              <initials>Nikita</initials>
              <email>pozdnishev97@gmail.com</email>
              <address>St. Petersburg, Russia</address>
            </individInfo>
          </author>
        </authors>
        <artTitles>
          <artTitle lang="ENG">Vibration exposure during pile driving in urban areas</artTitle>
        </artTitles>
        <abstracts>
          <abstract lang="ENG">In this article the disadvantages of using piles in urban areas and determined the optimal solution to this problem. The influence of driven, vibration indentation, drilling and screw driving to nearby buildings. The article also calculated acceleration provided by the nearby buildings, in particular on their foundations by using different mechanisms piles dive into the ground, such as vibration indentation, diesel hammer, and hydraulic hammer and sickle single action. Moreover, to determine the necessary safety distances from the location of the construction sites of the existing buildings and structures. The schedule of dependence of vibration accelerations caused by different types of pile driving mechanisms, the distance to the building. The advantages of the technology of foundation - use screw piles in urban areas.</abstract>
        </abstracts>
        <codes>
          <doi>10.34910/ALF.12.4</doi>
        </codes>
        <keywords>
          <kwdGroup lang="ENG">
            <keyword>screw pile</keyword>
            <keyword>foundation</keyword>
            <keyword>vibration acceleration</keyword>
            <keyword>vibration indentation</keyword>
            <keyword>diesel hammer</keyword>
            <keyword>urban development</keyword>
          </kwdGroup>
        </keywords>
        <files>
          <furl>https://alfabuild.spbstu.ru/article/2019.12.4/</furl>
          <file>12_4.pdf</file>
        </files>
      </article>
      <article>
        <artType>REV</artType>
        <langPubl>RUS</langPubl>
        <pages>44-52</pages>
        <authors>
          <author num="001">
            <individInfo lang="ENG">
              <orgName>Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University</orgName>
              <surname>Nazarov</surname>
              <initials>Mikhail</initials>
              <email>mikenazarow@yandex.ru</email>
              <address>St. Petersburg, Russia</address>
            </individInfo>
          </author>
          <author num="002">
            <individInfo lang="ENG">
              <orgName>Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University</orgName>
              <surname>Kitsaev</surname>
              <initials>Maxim</initials>
              <email>mr.kitsaev@mail.ru</email>
              <address>St. Petersburg, Russia</address>
            </individInfo>
          </author>
          <author num="003">
            <individInfo lang="ENG">
              <orgName>Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University</orgName>
              <surname>Zimin</surname>
              <initials>Sergej</initials>
              <email>zimin_sergei@mail.ru</email>
              <address>St. Petersburg, Russia</address>
            </individInfo>
          </author>
        </authors>
        <artTitles>
          <artTitle lang="ENG">Approaches to reinforced concrete beams shear performance</artTitle>
        </artTitles>
        <abstracts>
          <abstract lang="ENG">Practice shows that cracks are frequently formed beside reinforced concrete beam supports, and can be the cause of destruction on inclined sections. Cracks formation connected with principal tensile stresses. At the moment, acceptable in engineering practice methodology for inclined cracks analysis haven’t been found. That is why different simplified approaches were introduced. This research was aimed to look through Russian and European construction regulations and find out, which method could be considered as more usable and completed. Calculations showed that both methodologies significantly underestimate load-carrying ability, but Russian approach allows to design more economic shear reinforcement. The same result was declared by other authors.</abstract>
        </abstracts>
        <codes>
          <doi>10.34910/ALF.12.5</doi>
        </codes>
        <keywords>
          <kwdGroup lang="ENG">
            <keyword>building construction</keyword>
            <keyword>reinforced concrete structures</keyword>
            <keyword>transverse force</keyword>
            <keyword>diagonal crack</keyword>
            <keyword>load-carrying ability</keyword>
            <keyword>methodology for structural analysis</keyword>
            <keyword>construction regulations</keyword>
          </kwdGroup>
        </keywords>
        <files>
          <furl>https://alfabuild.spbstu.ru/article/2019.12.5/</furl>
          <file>12_5.pdf</file>
        </files>
      </article>
      <article>
        <artType>REV</artType>
        <langPubl>RUS</langPubl>
        <pages>53-59</pages>
        <authors>
          <author num="001">
            <individInfo lang="ENG">
              <orgName>Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University</orgName>
              <surname>Nenakhova</surname>
              <initials>Irina</initials>
              <email>irina-nenahova-v@mail.ru</email>
              <address>St. Petersburg, Russia</address>
            </individInfo>
          </author>
        </authors>
        <artTitles>
          <artTitle lang="ENG">Modeling and calculation of a two-stored power-and-efficient house for seismic control areas</artTitle>
        </artTitles>
        <abstracts>
          <abstract lang="ENG">In the northern regions of the Russian Federation (Tomsk, Novosibirsk and other regions), a project of an energy-efficient two-story building with a metal frame was developed and implemented. In many regions of the Kyrgyz Republic, such energy efficiency is particularly relevant. However, the introduction of the practice of building such buildings in mountainous terrain requires additional studies to assess the strength and deformation characteristics from the position of seismic safety. The problem of modeling and calculation of a two-storey energy-efficient residential building for seismically hazardous areas is considered. The model of the building under investigation designed and made in metal is presented, the stability of the structure is checked for various types of loads. The results of the study confirm the feasibility of the project for construction in seismically hazardous areas.</abstract>
        </abstracts>
        <codes>
          <doi>10.34910/ALF.12.6</doi>
        </codes>
        <keywords>
          <kwdGroup lang="ENG">
            <keyword>model</keyword>
            <keyword>seismic</keyword>
            <keyword>destruction</keyword>
            <keyword>stability</keyword>
            <keyword>frame.</keyword>
          </kwdGroup>
        </keywords>
        <files>
          <furl>https://alfabuild.spbstu.ru/article/2019.12.6/</furl>
          <file>12_6.pdf</file>
        </files>
      </article>
      <article>
        <artType>RAR</artType>
        <langPubl>RUS</langPubl>
        <pages>60-66</pages>
        <authors>
          <author num="001">
            <individInfo lang="ENG">
              <orgName>Belarusian-Russian University</orgName>
              <surname>Moskalkova</surname>
              <initials>Yuliya</initials>
              <email>julia43@tut.by</email>
              <address>Mogilev, Belarus</address>
            </individInfo>
          </author>
        </authors>
        <artTitles>
          <artTitle lang="ENG">Polypropylene fiber-reinforced claydite concrete</artTitle>
        </artTitles>
        <abstracts>
          <abstract lang="ENG">The paper presents an analysis of the possibility of using polypropylene fibers for fiber-reinforced claydite concrete. An analytical review of empirical literature deals with the efforts of various researchers in production of the polymeric fiber-reinforced normal concrete and lightweight aggregate con-crete. Based on this review, it was concluded that the optimum content of polymer fiber by weight. Cases where polymer fiber reinforcement proves to be ineffective are considered. In addition, the variants of com-bined reinforcement by different types of fiber are considered: polymeric and steel fiber, polymer and glass fiber. The use of polymeric fiber and acrylic polymer is also considered. The results of the test of the first trial series of prototypes made of polypropylene fiber-reinforced claydite concrete are presented (the raw material used for making claydite concrete is found in the Republic of Belarus). From the analytical review, it is observed that the optimum dosage of polypropylene fiber is 0.5–1.5 % of the cement weight in claydite concrete. Prospects for further research are described in general terms.</abstract>
        </abstracts>
        <codes>
          <doi>10.34910/ALF.12.7</doi>
        </codes>
        <keywords>
          <kwdGroup lang="ENG">
            <keyword>lightweight aggregate concrete</keyword>
            <keyword>claydite</keyword>
            <keyword>fiber reinforcement</keyword>
            <keyword>polypropylene fibers</keyword>
            <keyword>reinforcement ratio</keyword>
          </kwdGroup>
        </keywords>
        <files>
          <furl>https://alfabuild.spbstu.ru/article/2019.12.7/</furl>
          <file>12_7.pdf</file>
        </files>
      </article>
      <article>
        <artType>RAR</artType>
        <langPubl>RUS</langPubl>
        <pages>67-84</pages>
        <authors>
          <author num="001">
            <individInfo lang="ENG">
              <orgName>Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University</orgName>
              <surname>Ngo</surname>
              <initials>Huu Hieu</initials>
              <email>ngohuuhieubkdn123@gmail.com</email>
              <address>St. Petersburg, Russia</address>
            </individInfo>
          </author>
        </authors>
        <artTitles>
          <artTitle lang="ENG">Influence of deformation on reinforced concrete beam elements with uneven heating</artTitle>
        </artTitles>
        <abstracts>
          <abstract lang="ENG">Currently, in the chemical industry and the energy sector, many destroyed buildings are exposed to high temperatures. In this article, the influence of deformation of reinforced concrete structural elements (ZhBEK) of the corresponding boundary conditions is analyzed with versatile heating up to +200 degrees Celsius. The finite element method (FEM) was used to simulate the process of deformation of reinforced concrete structural elements in ANSYS Mechanical (Workbench), as well as data on the deformation of reinforced concrete structural elements of structures. One of the most common such complexes today is the ANSYS program, using the finite element method, is a multi-purpose package of design and analysis, recognized throughout the world. ANSYS Mechanical (Workbench) provides ample opportunities for the implementation of project development, analysis and optimization.</abstract>
        </abstracts>
        <codes>
          <doi>10.34910/ALF.12.8</doi>
        </codes>
        <keywords>
          <kwdGroup lang="ENG">
            <keyword>Reinforced structural elements (ZhBEK)</keyword>
            <keyword>deformation</keyword>
            <keyword>versatile heating</keyword>
            <keyword>finite element method (FEM)</keyword>
            <keyword>ANSYS Mechanical (Workbench)</keyword>
          </kwdGroup>
        </keywords>
        <files>
          <furl>https://alfabuild.spbstu.ru/article/2019.12.8/</furl>
          <file>12_8.pdf</file>
        </files>
      </article>
      <article>
        <artType>RAR</artType>
        <langPubl>RUS</langPubl>
        <pages>85-97</pages>
        <authors>
          <author num="001">
            <individInfo lang="ENG">
              <orgName>Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University</orgName>
              <surname>Desyatova</surname>
              <initials>Polina</initials>
              <email>desyatovapolina@gmail.com</email>
              <address>St. Petersburg, Russia</address>
            </individInfo>
          </author>
          <author num="002">
            <individInfo lang="ENG">
              <orgName>Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University</orgName>
              <surname>Dronov</surname>
              <initials>Danil</initials>
              <email>dronovdanil@mail.ru</email>
              <address>St. Petersburg, Russia</address>
            </individInfo>
          </author>
          <author num="003">
            <individInfo lang="ENG">
              <orgName>Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University</orgName>
              <surname>Nenashev</surname>
              <initials>Valentin</initials>
              <email>v.s.nenashev@gmail.com</email>
              <address>St. Petersburg, Russia</address>
            </individInfo>
          </author>
        </authors>
        <artTitles>
          <artTitle lang="ENG">Graphic comparison of masonry compressive strength formulas</artTitle>
        </artTitles>
        <abstracts>
          <abstract lang="ENG">The need to use non-destructive methods for studying the strength of brick structures is an urgent task today. One of the non-destructive methods is the use of formulas for calculating the compressive strength of brickwork.This article is about a comparative analysis of three empirical formulas for determining the strength of brickwork for compression, used in building codes of Russia and Europe. The graphs below show the dependence of the design values of the ultimate strength of brickwork under compression on the strength of the brick. This makes possible to see the difference in the calculation methods. Moreover, there was a discrepancy found in professor Onyshika's formula during the work from his "Stone-made constructions" monography with formula in Stone-made and armo-stone made constructions guideline. (SNiP II-22-81).</abstract>
        </abstracts>
        <codes>
          <doi>10.34910/ALF.12.9</doi>
        </codes>
        <keywords>
          <kwdGroup lang="ENG">
            <keyword>brick</keyword>
            <keyword>masonry</keyword>
            <keyword>compression</keyword>
            <keyword>formulas</keyword>
            <keyword>analysis</keyword>
            <keyword>brickwork</keyword>
            <keyword>Eurocode</keyword>
          </kwdGroup>
        </keywords>
        <files>
          <furl>https://alfabuild.spbstu.ru/article/2019.12.9/</furl>
          <file>12_9.pdf</file>
        </files>
      </article>
      <article>
        <artType>REV</artType>
        <langPubl>RUS</langPubl>
        <pages>98-111</pages>
        <authors>
          <author num="001">
            <authorCodes>
              <scopusid>6506030356</scopusid>
              <orcid>0000-0001-6744-9249</orcid>
            </authorCodes>
            <individInfo lang="ENG">
              <orgName>Tampere University</orgName>
              <surname>Garifullin</surname>
              <initials>Marsel</initials>
              <email>marsel.garifullin@tuni.fi</email>
              <address>Tampere, Finland</address>
            </individInfo>
          </author>
          <author num="002">
            <individInfo lang="ENG">
              <orgName>Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University</orgName>
              <surname>Vasileva</surname>
              <initials>Ekaterina</initials>
              <email>vaska96@yandex.ru</email>
              <address>St. Petersburg, Russia</address>
            </individInfo>
          </author>
        </authors>
        <artTitles>
          <artTitle lang="ENG">Resistance of welded RHS joints</artTitle>
        </artTitles>
        <abstracts>
          <abstract lang="ENG">Welded tubular structures are used in a wide range of trusses and frames. In the design of steel structures, Particular attention is paid to the design of joints. The article presents a literature review on the current design methods and rules for welded rectangular hollow section joints. The review discusses the advantages and disadvantages of the presented design methods. Moreover, attention is paid to the reduction coefficients for joints made of high strength steel, which does not allow to obtain all economic benefits from using high strength steels in the construction industry. In addition, there is still a lack of research on tubular joints under out-of-plane bending.</abstract>
        </abstracts>
        <codes>
          <doi>10.34910/ALF.12.10</doi>
        </codes>
        <keywords>
          <kwdGroup lang="ENG">
            <keyword>welded joint</keyword>
            <keyword>rectangular hollow section</keyword>
            <keyword>design of joints</keyword>
            <keyword>design methods</keyword>
            <keyword>high strength steel</keyword>
          </kwdGroup>
        </keywords>
        <files>
          <furl>https://alfabuild.spbstu.ru/article/2019.12.10/</furl>
          <file>12_10.pdf</file>
        </files>
      </article>
    </articles>
  </issue>
</journal>
