<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<journal>
  <titleid>69439</titleid>
  <issn>2658-5553</issn>
  <journalInfo lang="ENG">
    <title>AlfaBuild</title>
  </journalInfo>
  <issue>
    <volume>10</volume>
    <number>3</number>
    <altNumber>10</altNumber>
    <dateUni>2019</dateUni>
    <pages>1-76</pages>
    <articles>
      <article>
        <artType>REV</artType>
        <langPubl>RUS</langPubl>
        <pages>7-16</pages>
        <authors>
          <author num="001">
            <individInfo lang="ENG">
              <orgName>Peter the Great St.Petersburg Polytechnic University, Russian Federation</orgName>
              <surname>Derkach</surname>
              <initials>Nikita</initials>
              <email>nikita.derkach@yandex.ru</email>
              <address>195251, Russia, St. Petersburg, Polytechnic St., 29</address>
            </individInfo>
          </author>
        </authors>
        <artTitles>
          <artTitle lang="ENG">Buildings and structures of a unique technological structure</artTitle>
        </artTitles>
        <abstracts>
          <abstract lang="ENG">The main problem in the design and construction of buildings and structures of a unique technological structure is the choice of the area in which they will be erected.The method of construction of a building and a structure depends From the place of their design and construction. The ecological features of the terrain are taken into account when selecting place of buildings. One way to solve this problem is to ensure the strength, stability, rigidity and safety of buildings and structures subjected to this type of special loads. This problem leads to the search for new effective solutions.It is necessary to develop a universal methodology for the design of buildings and structures of a unique technological structure, regardless of the area in which they will be erected</abstract>
        </abstracts>
        <codes>
          <doi>10.34910/ALF.10.1</doi>
        </codes>
        <keywords>
          <kwdGroup lang="ENG">
            <keyword>Buildings</keyword>
            <keyword>damage search</keyword>
            <keyword>structure</keyword>
            <keyword>experimental research</keyword>
            <keyword>energy conservation</keyword>
            <keyword>building materials</keyword>
            <keyword>construction</keyword>
            <keyword>urban construction</keyword>
          </kwdGroup>
        </keywords>
        <files>
          <furl>https://alfabuild.spbstu.ru/article/2019.10.1/</furl>
          <file>10_1.pdf</file>
        </files>
      </article>
      <article>
        <artType>REV</artType>
        <langPubl>RUS</langPubl>
        <pages>17-22</pages>
        <authors>
          <author num="001">
            <individInfo lang="ENG">
              <orgName>Peter the Great St.Petersburg Polytechnic University, Russian Federation</orgName>
              <surname>Romanova</surname>
              <initials>Oksana</initials>
              <email>okaveryanova@yandex.ru</email>
              <address>195251, Russia, St. Petersburg, Polytechnic St., 29</address>
            </individInfo>
          </author>
        </authors>
        <artTitles>
          <artTitle lang="ENG">Provision of architectural requirements and standards for "green construction" in the reconstruction of the building of the baths of Tseleibeyevs</artTitle>
        </artTitles>
        <abstracts>
          <abstract lang="ENG">In connection with the growing popularity of the reconstruction of old buildings in the center of St. Petersburg as an alternative to the construction of new buildings, there is a need to assess the compliance of existing enclosing structures with modern requirements for heat-transfer. In this work, landmark erected in the beginning of the 20th century is considered. The building of the baths of merchants Tselibeev, located in the historical center of the city, is the object of reconstruction with a change in its functional purpose. For this reason, the work analyzes the enclosing structures and assesses the possibility of their functioning in accordance with modern requirements for heat-transfer in conjunction with the need to preserve the original architectural aspect of the facade, the most significant in the building sequence of Nekrasov Street</abstract>
        </abstracts>
        <codes>
          <doi>10.34910/ALF.10.2</doi>
        </codes>
        <keywords>
          <kwdGroup lang="ENG">
            <keyword>reconstruction</keyword>
            <keyword>reconstruction with change of functional purpose</keyword>
            <keyword>reconstruction of landmark</keyword>
            <keyword>architectural merit</keyword>
            <keyword>enclosing structures</keyword>
            <keyword>heat-transfer resistance</keyword>
          </kwdGroup>
        </keywords>
        <files>
          <furl>https://alfabuild.spbstu.ru/article/2019.10.2/</furl>
          <file>10_2.pdf</file>
        </files>
      </article>
      <article>
        <artType>UNK</artType>
        <langPubl>RUS</langPubl>
        <pages>23-35</pages>
        <authors>
          <author num="001">
            <authorCodes/>
            <individInfo lang="ENG">
              <orgName>Peter the Great St.Petersburg Polytechnic University, Russian Federation</orgName>
              <surname>Kutsenko</surname>
              <initials>Dinara</initials>
              <email>dinarakutsenko@mail.ru</email>
              <address>195251, Russia, St. Petersburg, Polytechnic St., 29</address>
            </individInfo>
          </author>
          <author num="002">
            <individInfo lang="ENG">
              <orgName>Peter the Great St.Petersburg Polytechnic University, Russian Federation</orgName>
              <surname>Petrochenko</surname>
              <initials>Marina</initials>
              <email>mpetroch@mail.ru</email>
              <address>195251, Russia, St. Petersburg, Polytechnic St., 29</address>
            </individInfo>
          </author>
          <author num="003">
            <individInfo lang="ENG">
              <orgName>Peter the Great St.Petersburg Polytechnic University, Russian Federation</orgName>
              <surname>Naboka</surname>
              <initials>Aleksandr</initials>
              <email>naboka1994@bk.ru</email>
              <address>195251, Russia, St. Petersburg, Polytechnic St., 29</address>
            </individInfo>
          </author>
        </authors>
        <artTitles>
          <artTitle lang="ENG">Methodologies of conducting technological and price audit of the investment project</artTitle>
        </artTitles>
        <abstracts>
          <abstract lang="ENG">The increasing volume of public investment in capital construction and the lack of explicit control over the effectiveness of investment projects at all stages of their implementation have revealed the need for additional regulation and an assessment of the effectiveness of spending budget funds. The development of an integrated and systematic approach to such regulation led to the establishment of an institute for an independent public technological and price audit. An independent and public TCA is the most effective mechanism for increasing the efficiency of an investment and construction project. The article deals with the mechanisms of technological and price audit for investment projects with state participation in accordance with the current Government Decree, according to the Draft Government Decree for investment projects of natural monopoly objects, as well as the standards of organizations. The article presents a comparative analysis with the aim of further improving the existing methodology</abstract>
        </abstracts>
        <codes>
          <doi>10.34910/ALF.10.3</doi>
        </codes>
        <keywords>
          <kwdGroup lang="ENG">
            <keyword>technological audit</keyword>
            <keyword>price audit</keyword>
            <keyword>audit</keyword>
            <keyword>investment project</keyword>
            <keyword>public investment</keyword>
          </kwdGroup>
        </keywords>
        <files>
          <furl>https://alfabuild.spbstu.ru/article/2019.10.3/</furl>
          <file>10_3.pdf</file>
        </files>
      </article>
      <article>
        <artType>REV</artType>
        <langPubl>RUS</langPubl>
        <pages>36-47</pages>
        <authors>
          <author num="001">
            <individInfo lang="ENG">
              <orgName>Peter the Great St.Petersburg Polytechnic University, Russian Federation</orgName>
              <surname>Marichev</surname>
              <initials>Alexey</initials>
              <email>lexa-ap94@yandex.ru</email>
              <address>195251, Russia, St. Petersburg, Polytechnic St., 29</address>
            </individInfo>
          </author>
          <author num="002">
            <individInfo lang="ENG">
              <orgName>Peter the Great St.Petersburg Polytechnic University, Russian Federation</orgName>
              <surname>Grishina</surname>
              <initials>Olga</initials>
              <email>olgasergeevna2009@yandex.ru</email>
              <address>195251, Russia, St. Petersburg, Polytechnic St., 29</address>
            </individInfo>
          </author>
          <author num="003">
            <authorCodes/>
            <individInfo lang="ENG">
              <orgName>Peter the Great St.Petersburg Polytechnic University, Russian Federation</orgName>
              <surname>Kukushkina</surname>
              <initials>Galina</initials>
              <email>kukushkina_ga@mail.ru</email>
              <address>195251, Russia, St. Petersburg, Polytechnic St., 29</address>
            </individInfo>
          </author>
        </authors>
        <artTitles>
          <artTitle lang="ENG">Experience of implementing BIM technology in the company of the old and new sample</artTitle>
        </artTitles>
        <abstracts>
          <abstract lang="ENG">Domestic companies began to actively introduce BIM - technologies in their design departments. However, instead of using ready-made methods and achievements of foreign organizations have to create a whole methodology and information base for the specifics of the company, and often modify or create from scratch, which further complicates the transition and implementation process. Nevertheless, there are a large number of companies that are ready to provide their services to create internal standards. In this article, we describe the experience of introducing technology in a company with a different organization structure. Also, based on this experience, general recommendations are given on the deployment of the BIM platform in its department, with minimal costs</abstract>
        </abstracts>
        <codes>
          <doi>10.34910/ALF.10.4</doi>
        </codes>
        <keywords>
          <kwdGroup lang="ENG">
            <keyword>designing</keyword>
            <keyword>BIM - technologies</keyword>
            <keyword>management</keyword>
            <keyword>organization</keyword>
            <keyword>productivity</keyword>
            <keyword>productivity</keyword>
            <keyword>optimization</keyword>
            <keyword>efficiency</keyword>
          </kwdGroup>
        </keywords>
        <files>
          <furl>https://alfabuild.spbstu.ru/article/2019.10.4/</furl>
          <file>10_4.pdf</file>
        </files>
      </article>
      <article>
        <artType>REV</artType>
        <langPubl>RUS</langPubl>
        <pages>48-58</pages>
        <authors>
          <author num="001">
            <individInfo lang="ENG">
              <orgName>Peter the Great St.Petersburg Polytechnic University, Russian Federation</orgName>
              <surname>Olshevskiy</surname>
              <initials>Vyacheslav</initials>
              <email>79119199526@yandex.ru</email>
              <address>195251, Russia, St. Petersburg, Polytechnic St., 29</address>
            </individInfo>
          </author>
          <author num="002">
            <individInfo lang="ENG">
              <surname>Dontsova</surname>
              <initials>Anna</initials>
              <email>anne.dontsoova@gmail.com</email>
            </individInfo>
          </author>
          <author num="003">
            <authorCodes/>
            <individInfo lang="ENG">
              <orgName>Peter the Great St.Petersburg Polytechnic University, Russian Federation</orgName>
              <surname>Kalinina</surname>
              <initials>Aksinya</initials>
              <email>kalinina0906@yandex.ru</email>
              <address>195251, Russia, St. Petersburg, Polytechnic St., 29</address>
            </individInfo>
          </author>
        </authors>
        <artTitles>
          <artTitle lang="ENG">Energy efficiency of hinged ventilated facades</artTitle>
        </artTitles>
        <abstracts>
          <abstract lang="ENG">The purpose of the study was to to examine thermal homogeneity of the wall with ventilated façade. In the theoretical part of the study the main aim was to study basic characteristics of ventilated façade system. Despite high energy efficiency rates of such systems, the key issue was the thermal bridge problem. Previous studies have indicated that anchors, on which the metal profile is fixed, penetrate the insulation, degrading the thermal characteristics of the wall. The study was aimed at assessing the strength of the thermal bridge effect by creating a wall thermogram. The results of the study showed the need of reiteration of the experiments in other weather conditions for greater reliability of information</abstract>
        </abstracts>
        <codes>
          <doi>10.34910/ALF.10.5</doi>
        </codes>
        <keywords>
          <kwdGroup lang="ENG">
            <keyword>energy efficiency</keyword>
            <keyword>facades</keyword>
            <keyword>thermal insulation</keyword>
            <keyword>ventilation</keyword>
            <keyword>air circulation</keyword>
            <keyword>natural ventilation</keyword>
          </kwdGroup>
        </keywords>
        <files>
          <furl>https://alfabuild.spbstu.ru/article/2019.10.5/</furl>
          <file>10_5.pdf</file>
        </files>
      </article>
      <article>
        <artType>REV</artType>
        <langPubl>RUS</langPubl>
        <pages>59-69</pages>
        <authors>
          <author num="001">
            <authorCodes/>
            <individInfo lang="ENG">
              <orgName>Peter the Great St.Petersburg Polytechnic University, Russian Federation</orgName>
              <surname>Kalacheva</surname>
              <initials>Anastasia</initials>
              <email>nastiakalatc.96@gmail.com</email>
              <address>195251, Russia, St. Petersburg, Polytechnic St., 29</address>
            </individInfo>
          </author>
          <author num="002">
            <authorCodes>
              <scopusid>56237511300</scopusid>
            </authorCodes>
            <individInfo lang="ENG">
              <orgName>Steel Construction Development Association</orgName>
              <surname>Nazmeeva</surname>
              <initials>Tatiana Vilsovna</initials>
              <email>naztv@mail.ru</email>
              <address>Moscow, Russian Federation</address>
            </individInfo>
          </author>
        </authors>
        <artTitles>
          <artTitle lang="ENG">Prerequisites for industrial renovation and conservation methods of the architectural heritage of Moscow</artTitle>
        </artTitles>
        <abstracts>
          <abstract lang="ENG">This article discusses the problems and potential of degrading industrial areas. The review of the Russian experience of renovation of industrial zones of Moscow is presented. Examples of the renovation of the Golutvinsky manufactory of gas tanks in the Armagh business centre and business quarter Novospasskiy. The group of factors influencing expediency of renovation of industrial territories is revealed. These are constructive, economic, aesthetic, social, historical and environmental factors. The article presents two methods of renovation:A comparative analysis of the two methods of renovation: the use of the existing industrial building and the method of constructing the frame of the existing industrial building.The comparative analysis of these two methods, identified their strengths and weaknesses. Based on the analysis, the method of using the existing building, as it is most suitable for preserving the architectural and historical heritage of the city of Moscow</abstract>
        </abstracts>
        <codes>
          <doi>10.34910/ALF.10.6</doi>
        </codes>
        <keywords>
          <kwdGroup lang="ENG">
            <keyword>renovation of industrial territories</keyword>
            <keyword>reconstruction of industrial buildings</keyword>
            <keyword>redevelopment of territories</keyword>
            <keyword>industrial zones of Moscow</keyword>
            <keyword>methods of renovation</keyword>
          </kwdGroup>
        </keywords>
        <files>
          <furl>https://alfabuild.spbstu.ru/article/2019.10.6/</furl>
          <file>10_6.pdf</file>
        </files>
      </article>
      <article>
        <artType>REV</artType>
        <langPubl>RUS</langPubl>
        <pages>70-76</pages>
        <authors>
          <author num="001">
            <individInfo lang="ENG">
              <orgName>Peter the Great St.Petersburg Polytechnic University, Russian Federation</orgName>
              <surname>Larionova</surname>
              <initials>Uliana</initials>
              <email>ulianca18@gmail.com</email>
              <address>195251, Russia, St. Petersburg, Polytechnic St., 29</address>
            </individInfo>
          </author>
          <author num="002">
            <individInfo lang="ENG">
              <orgName>Peter the Great St.Petersburg Polytechnic University, Russian Federation</orgName>
              <surname>Kuznetsov</surname>
              <initials>Maksim</initials>
              <email>kuzkuz677@gmail.com</email>
              <address>195251, Russia, St. Petersburg, Polytechnic St., 29</address>
            </individInfo>
          </author>
        </authors>
        <artTitles>
          <artTitle lang="ENG">Standard prefabricated stone structures of the Peter's the Great Docks</artTitle>
        </artTitles>
        <abstracts>
          <abstract lang="ENG">Standard stone structures of the Peter the Great Dock in Kronstadt is considered in this article. Stairs in the dock had been made from timber and subsequently there was a need for their reconstruction, which started in 1850s. This event became main catalyst searching optimal solution for a difficult task for those times. Standard stone structures were chosen as the most reliable and cost-effective option, under the conditions of complex logistics and the marine climate of the island. On the example of reinforced concrete patches, which were installed during the subsequent reconstruction of the dock, the theme of the advantages of the strength characteristics of stone materials compared with reinforced concrete is considered. This comparison shows that under modern conditions and more advanced technologies that reduce the cost of processing large blocks of stone and their installation with transportation, stone structures can compete in the market with traditional wood and concrete</abstract>
        </abstracts>
        <codes>
          <doi>10.34910/ALF.10.7</doi>
        </codes>
        <keywords>
          <kwdGroup lang="ENG">
            <keyword>standard prefabricated structures</keyword>
            <keyword>stairs</keyword>
            <keyword>Peter the Great dock</keyword>
            <keyword>Kronstadt</keyword>
            <keyword>granite</keyword>
            <keyword>Kronstadt dock</keyword>
            <keyword>masonry structures</keyword>
          </kwdGroup>
        </keywords>
        <files>
          <furl>https://alfabuild.spbstu.ru/article/2019.10.7/</furl>
          <file>10_7.pdf</file>
        </files>
      </article>
    </articles>
  </issue>
</journal>
